On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 18:40:11 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
VZ> The advantage of the check listbox is that you only have to check/uncheck VZ> one item to toggle between searching recursively or not. And removing is VZ> simpler, too. Are there any problems with this approach I'm missing? I don't think so. I had actually thought about this, but prefered to suggest the simplest to implement approach that, maybe, was not obvious. Then it's up to you to implement the one you want: simpler to use, or simpler to code ;) VZ> XN> I would add that the 'search...' option should be available with VZ> XN> a right-click on the folder. VZ> VZ> Why not. I try to keep the context menus as short as possible but maybe we VZ> could remove the "Delete" command from the menu to make place for this one? I agree with you. I do not use 'Delete' everyday ! And maybe it is a little dangerous to have such a command in this context menu, even if there is a dialog to warn the user. VZ> XN> And would it be possible to have the progress dialog count the number of VZ> XN> messages in *all* the looked for folders. My understanding is that VZ> XN> currently it is re-created for each folder. VZ> VZ> Probably, yes. It definitely should, and it should be possible to cancel VZ> the search as well. Yes. -- Xavier Nodet PGP fingerprint: EFE0 0E75 C4DC 2654 5C36 4E2D 107C 19DE 0646 1FE2 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
