On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:56:11 +0200 (CEST) Robert Vazan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RV> > And I don't understand how can this work, you don't know whether the RV> > message is spam or not before filtering it. RV> RV> But you do know whether spam filter is used or not. It is used in 90% of cases, so what? This is what I thought from reading the code: that you just checked if it was used. But this doesn't make sense, I have ~50 filters and spam is just one of them, but it doesn't mean that I get only spam (well, not yet...). RV> We could update progress dialog *after* filtering. Then it wouldn't be _progress_ any more... RV> > I think this change should be reversed... If you don't see these RV> > messages at all it could be better to have "silent filters" option. RV> RV> This would (1) hide subjects in non-spam filters, (2) it would show RV> subjects while opening folder that is going to be filtered, (3) it would RV> have unreasonable default: show, and (4) it wouldn't be used for anything RV> else, so why generalize it. I just don't see the problem you're trying to solve... I proposed this option to avoid showing the progress messages as you seem to dislike them, but for me the old code (before "hidden in spam filter" change) worked 100% fine so I'd be quite happy to return to the old state. Thanks, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
