On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:51:00 +0200 (CEST) Robert Vazan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RV> I think the main advantage of boost classes is standard naming.
Definitely. This and that many people already know them. This is why I
want to call the non copiable smart pointer ScopedPtr BTW, not AutoPtr:
because people [must] know what auto_ptr<> is and [should] know what
scoped_ptr<> is and we don't want to confuse them.
RV> > shared_ptr<> may be used for intrusive ref counting too.
RV>
RV> Am I misunderstanding something? The only mention of intrusive ref counting
RV> says that it has been dropped.
I was speaking about this:
http://www.boost.org/libs/smart_ptr/sp_techniques.html#com
(and the next subsection).
Bye,
VZ
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
