On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:51:51 -0400 David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Vazan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Looking at the test matrix at boost.org, VC6 does support these classes... > > > > I am talking about optimizations. Templates don't have to be instantiated > > for every type, but compilers won't realize it. > > I don't know what you mean. Nothing about the boost shared_ptr > design causes aggressive template instantiation. I know it, but did you test it with Gcc and VC6? The official benchmark, I linked before, shows that Gcc slows down even if you just wrap raw pointer in template. I don't believe that templates work. I am using them like macros and I shift as much code as possible to non-template functions. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
