On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:57:42 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:51:00 +0200 (CEST) Robert Vazan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > RV> I think the main advantage of boost classes is standard naming. > > Definitely. This and that many people already know them. This is why I > want to call the non copiable smart pointer ScopedPtr BTW, not AutoPtr: > because people [must] know what auto_ptr<> is and [should] know what > scoped_ptr<> is and we don't want to confuse them. I will rename it. I might even rename it to scoped_ptr, but I have to check whether Boost's interface is OK. > http://www.boost.org/libs/smart_ptr/sp_techniques.html#com This solves compatibility with MObjectRC and other section also shows how to hide destructors. But the performance problem is still there. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
