> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > GM> This is why I'd like to stop autocollecting - reading some mailing lists, I > GM> always get a lot of adresses that I will hardly ever actively use but that > GM> make expansion ambiguous :-(
Yes, this is why I have autocollect turned off. But on a business account, I would want it turned on. On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think one solution to the problem of ambiguous expansion would be to not > consider the autocollected addresses at all if there was a match in the > other address books. Another one would be this my "always use this for > expansion" checkbox but I still have no idea about how to implement it > (i.e. what exactly should it do). Ideally I'd like it to read my thoughts > but I'm not sure I can find a freely available C++ library implementing > this, unfortunately. I think it would be very helpful to be able to expand on nickname only unless there was no nickname match. I.e., i. check nicknames a. if such nickname exists, expand on that only b. if no such nickname, expand on other fields Until we have this, it would be very helpful if nickname matches were listed first. (Obviously, I rely heavily on nicknames, as will all former pine users I suspect.) On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to > highlight the email addresses in the message view. Then you'd be able to > right click them and do "Reply to" or "Add to address book". The advantage > of adding these items to the folder view menu is that it would allow you to > do it with several messages at once but I don't think this is very useful > in practice and the advantage of the menu in the message view is that it's > much more clear from the UI point of view IMHO (when you see an underlined > address you just want to right click it, right?). This would be great, and I agree that the message view would be preferable. One other idea: right now if I try to extract addresses to the address book, all are automaticall selected. An UnselectAll option would be very useful when there is a long list of which I want one, which happens to me pretty often. Alan _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
