On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 22:25:09 +0200 (CEST) Gerhard H�ring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GH> When I try to subscribe to a newsgroup (I have a caching NNTP server), the GH> fetching of the headers takes *ages*. The NG contains ca. 25000 postings, and GH> Mahogany estimates it will take 3 hours or so. slrn/pan/sylpheed can download GH> the headers in a matter of seconds, when they're all fully cached at my NNTP GH> server. Hello, can they _really_ download 25000 headers in the matter of seconds? This would be surprizing... I think they simply don't do it. The problem is that Mahogany shouldn't do it neither and I am not sure why does it do it. Could you turn off the sorting and threading for your NNTP server and retry it? GH> Nobody's seriously using it as a NNTP client at this performance?! No, I don't think anybody is uding it as a news client. I.e. even I don't simply because it lacks many important news reader features (e.g. scoring!). On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:35:53 +0200 (CEST) Gerhard H�ring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GH> > One other thing: I'd like to store sent messages in a folder on my IMAP GH> > server. GH> GH> Ok, I found out how to do that in the meantime. Good :-) GH> > [...] The snapshot and CVS versions both fail to compile. I can't judge if GH> > its because of messed up sources, or because they need something other than GH> > wxWindows 2.3.2.1 to compile against. GH> GH> The mails on the M developer mailing list hint that I need the CVS version of GH> wxWindows for the development version of M. Is that correct? Yes, it is. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
