On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 15:59:26 +0200 (CEST) Manuel Guesdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

MG> But before someone code it, it may be interesting to think about how we
MG> could integrate this kind of thing.

 Of course!

MG> BTW, there's a at least one standard for crypted/signed messages:
MG> S/MIME (which I dont know). 

 Me neither. There is a free library to work with it, though:

        http://www.imc.org/imc-sfl/index.html

MG> There's four basic cases concerning encryption/signature:
MG>         o sending a signed message
MG>         o sending an encrypted message
MG>         o testing signature of received signed message
MG>         o decrypting recieved message
MG> which could be combined (sending a signed encrypted message, receiving
MG> a signed encrypted message).
MG> 
MG> Some times ago, I've started thinking about how to deal with this kind
MG> of things.

 As I've just written in another reply, it would be great if we could
specify how all this should work from the UI point of view.

MG> For example: I receive an encrypted message and decrypt it. OK Now,
MG> some people may want to keep only encrypted message (and have to
MG> decrypt it each time they want to read it). Some other people like to
MG> keep only decrypted version and may be some others want to keep the 2
MG> versions :-) How to deal with this ?

 This has been discussed before but I don't remember the conclusion :-(
>From the implementor's point of view I can say that decrypting on the fly
is much simpler to do, so I'd prefer this (just think of what happens when
you're a viewing an encrypted message in a read only folder...).

MG>         o I receive a signed message. I'd like to know  what is signed
MG>         ('text', all message including attachements, 'text' +
MG>         attachements, only some of the attachements,...).

 Good question, no idea about the answer. Anyone?

MG>         o I send encrypted or signed message. It will be great to keep
MG>         the information that message was encrypted/signed.

 We might add an X-Mahogany-Signed/Encrypted header to the message saved in
SentMail...

MG> I haven't tried other mail client for a long time (yes, I really like
MG> mahogany :-).

[thanks!]

 I'm in about the same situation :-)

MG> Does someone have feedback on how other mail clients handle this ?

 Again, good question...

 Regards,
VZ



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users

Reply via email to