Robert Vazan wrote:
Yes, I have been first thinking about "More >>" button, but that would lookHey, this group of whatever-boxes is not the main purpose of the dialog :) I don't think that a common user will spend even minutes on thinking what of the choices he/she needs. And the more "clicks" are needed to get to some choice, the less is possibility a user will choose that option. But we don't want to affect a user's opinion, do we? So I think all choices should be equal in a number of clicks.
ugly next to checkbox. Maybe appending "(check for more options)" would be
acceptable.
"More" buttons have another drawback. Many users think of "More>>" as something complex, not for their minds. So they will just never click it.
-- Alexey Rusakov aka Ktirf RingRows OOO
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
