On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:07:49 +1000 (EST) Mark Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ML> I'm coming along but I made the mistake of doing a cvs update which included ML> Robert's current work so I have to wait till he gets finished putting it all ML> back together again :-) Hmm, current cvs sources compile just fine under Windows. Do you mean they don't under Unix? ML> I've also give the Swig vs. Pyste issue some thought. What is Pyste? ML> ISTM that we should go for SWIG mainly for one good reason - If we do, ML> it is a whole lot easier for someone to come along later and add ML> support for scripting via one of the plethora of languages SWIG ML> supports (Perl, Python, Tcl, Guile, Mzscheme, Java, Ruby, PHP, Ocaml, ML> C# and CHICKEN). Yes, I agree that this is a strength of SWIG. At least Perl would be nice to have in addition to Python as I prefer it for quick hacks. Bye, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
