On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 01:35:11 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
VZ> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:07:49 +1000 (EST) Mark Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: VZ> VZ> ML> I'm coming along but I made the mistake of doing a cvs update which included VZ> ML> Robert's current work so I have to wait till he gets finished putting it all VZ> ML> back together again :-) VZ> VZ> Hmm, current cvs sources compile just fine under Windows. Do you mean they VZ> don't under Unix? Hmm, that's interesting - see my message to Robert in M-Dev to see what is happening here. Perhaps I have other problems? VZ> ML> I've also give the Swig vs. Pyste issue some thought. VZ> VZ> What is Pyste? That is Boost's SWIG equivalent as I understand it except it is only connecting C/C++ to Python. No other languages. VZ> ML> ISTM that we should go for SWIG mainly for one good reason - If we do, VZ> ML> it is a whole lot easier for someone to come along later and add VZ> ML> support for scripting via one of the plethora of languages SWIG VZ> ML> supports (Perl, Python, Tcl, Guile, Mzscheme, Java, Ruby, PHP, Ocaml, VZ> ML> C# and CHICKEN). VZ> VZ> Yes, I agree that this is a strength of SWIG. At least Perl would be nice VZ> to have in addition to Python as I prefer it for quick hacks. Absolutely, I know there are are also a few people in this community that like Java and PHP so using something that gives them access is a win-win for all. Dr. QA ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
