Am Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:35:47 +0100 (Romance Standard Time) schrieb (Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:51:47 +0100 (CET) Martin Jost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Could the threading/sorting-interaction please be changed in the following > > way: Threading is done first, in the "usual" way. Sorting comes as a second > > step. Sorting regards the whole threat as one entity. > > While this could make sense for dates, I don't think it would be really > helpful if sorting by sender or any other criterion. Ah, I was thinking of sorting by date. Sorting by sender would be a different beast. > The implementation of such a feature would probably not be too > difficult. This sounds good.... > But there is something else... Considering the newest message to tag the > entire thread means that any incoming message may move a whole thread. > Not very nice if it happens when you're looking at this thread or > another nearby... Yes, I see the point (but didn't think of it). Mainly because I have no permanent internet-connection and are doing the download using fetchmail. So this should be probably made just a new configuration option ? Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
