On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:31:10 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) BrenBarn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
B> Sure enough, when I turn threading off, it seems to work B> properly. It still seems like a bug though. (Did you try it with B> threading on?) Yes, I do see it with threading on. As to whether this is a bug or not, it's a more difficult question. This is, in fact, related to the discussion in the other messages in this thread. Currently M threads messages first and then sorts them inside each thread and so threading overrides sorting. It's true that the result is surprizing, to say the least, if there are no threads... Xavier, I do think it would be nice if we could sort the entire threads as Martin proposed. Pro: - should be faster (less stuff to sort!) - more logical if there are no threads (right now changing sort order doesn't do anything in this case, as reported by BrenBarn) Con: - could have strange results when sorting by anything but date, but then I also always disable threading in such case (should we do this automatically?) so it doesn't seem like a huge problem This is certainly not the most urgent problem in Mahogany but I think it would be nice if you could fix this -- I won't unfortunately have time to do it myself. TIA, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
