Am Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:28:21 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) schrieb (BrenBarn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
> As for the sorting/threading issue, it seems to be as if it DOES > sort the threads as units. The issue is that right now it seems to use > the root of the thread as the source of the sort information, whereas > the suggestion was to use the newest or oldest message in the thread. Yes, surely it sorts the messages in a thread as one entity right now. Just which sort-key to use for the thread is the point. (I just wanted to give a complete description of what I'm thinking about) BTW: What about sorting by size ? This too should (IHMO) be done for the biggest/smallest message in thread, depending on sort-order. > Personally I'm not too concerned about this, although the suggestion > does seem reasonable. It's also for me not a that big issue. So if I should just write a bug-tracker issue to have it remembered, just drop me a note. (But I will be on holiday for some time, so your message might reach me too late, to do it right now...) Martin P.S.: Two notes: - A friend of my just confirmed, that the problem with Umlaute in subject-lines is "really" gone. Works with different mailers in both directions. - He then tried to outsmart Mahogany by using UTF-8 - but didn't succeed ;-) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
