The earlier ones were more fun and really got at your goal: Mahout is
fun and good. This one is more reserved and doesn't pop as much, in
my non-artistic opinion.
Everyone's a critic... :-) Thanks for taking up the task, Lukas!
-Grant
On Feb 29, 2008, at 3:45 AM, juber patel wrote:
hi,
i am new to mahout-dev.
shouldn't the mahout, the guy, be a bit more prominent? when this logo
is in thumbnail size he would be hardly visible.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Dawid Weiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, ok -- I'd think we should stick to the font face of Hadoop, so
that there is
a clear visual link connecting the two. But maybe others have
different opinions
about it.
D.
Lukas Vlcek wrote:
Actually the font is not hand-drawn but regular vector type. The
same type
is used in both versions (standard and horizontal). Anyway, I can
try
experimenting with other fonts as well but I do personally like
this one.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Dawid Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
+1 for the basic version. My comment about fonts still applies
(I'd prefer
more
regular glyphs, not hand-drawn).
D.
Lukas Vlcek wrote:
Hi,
Here is my second proposal for the Mahout logo:
Basic version -
http://picasaweb.google.com/lukas.vlcek/Mahout/photo#5172299040948088882
Horizontal version -
http://picasaweb.google.com/lukas.vlcek/Mahout/photo#5172299040948088898
It is *just* draft/preview. Final version can differ in more or
less
details.
Feedback gladly welcomed!
Regards,
Lukas
--
Juber Patel http://juberpatel.googlepages.com
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Next Training: April 7, 2008 at ApacheCon Europe in Amsterdam
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
