On Monday 17 March 2008, edward yoon wrote:
> However, basically, i'd like to make the hama package which is a general
> purpose matrix package. So i prefer the area under the mahout as a
> sub-sub-project. 

If you really prefer your own project over integrating your code with the 
Mahout codebase, I would also suggest to go for a Hadoop sub project. Just as 
Grant already pointed out, the use cases of your matrix package are much more 
general than just machine learning.


> After much discuss with hadoop PMC and mahout-dev, I looked over the
> matter.

What was your conclusion? Where do you and the other hama developers see your 
package? Would you rather like to be general enough to be a hadoop sub 
project, or would you rather like to put special focus on the requirements of 
the machine learning community on your package?

Isabel


-- 
He who is known as an early riser need not get up until noon.
  |\      _,,,---,,_       Web:   <http://www.isabel-drost.de>
  /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_
 |,4-  ) )-,_..;\ (  `'-'
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) (fL)  IM:  <xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to