Hello, Isabel Drost. I`m Min Cha, a fellow worker of edward. Glad to meet you. I think Hama should aim to general purpose rathen than it becomes a piece in Mahout.
So, I would rather like to be a Hadoop sub project. +1 p.s However, if Hahout members want, we could provide Hama dependency library and do to apply feedbacks or additonal requirements from Hahout. I think it`s a good model for collaborating together and improving Hama and Hahout. 2008/3/17, Isabel Drost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Monday 17 March 2008, edward yoon wrote: > > However, basically, i'd like to make the hama package which is a general > > purpose matrix package. So i prefer the area under the mahout as a > > sub-sub-project. > > > If you really prefer your own project over integrating your code with the > Mahout codebase, I would also suggest to go for a Hadoop sub project. Just > as > Grant already pointed out, the use cases of your matrix package are much > more > general than just machine learning. > > > > > After much discuss with hadoop PMC and mahout-dev, I looked over the > > matter. > > > What was your conclusion? Where do you and the other hama developers see > your > package? Would you rather like to be general enough to be a hadoop sub > project, or would you rather like to put special focus on the requirements > of > the machine learning community on your package? > > Isabel > > > > -- > He who is known as an early riser need not get up until noon. > |\ _,,,---,,_ Web: <http://www.isabel-drost.de> > /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ > |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) (fL) IM: <xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
