Well, I don't think matrix needs of learning maching methods for data mining will be specified from the general matrix package.
But, I'm +1 for the hadoop sub-project. what do other members think? Thanks, Edward. On 3/17/08, Isabel Drost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 17 March 2008, edward yoon wrote: > > However, basically, i'd like to make the hama package which is a general > > purpose matrix package. So i prefer the area under the mahout as a > > sub-sub-project. > > If you really prefer your own project over integrating your code with the > Mahout codebase, I would also suggest to go for a Hadoop sub project. Just as > Grant already pointed out, the use cases of your matrix package are much more > general than just machine learning. > > > > After much discuss with hadoop PMC and mahout-dev, I looked over the > > matter. > > What was your conclusion? Where do you and the other hama developers see your > package? Would you rather like to be general enough to be a hadoop sub > project, or would you rather like to put special focus on the requirements of > the machine learning community on your package? > > Isabel > > > -- > He who is known as an early riser need not get up until noon. > |\ _,,,---,,_ Web: <http://www.isabel-drost.de> > /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ > |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) (fL) IM: <xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
