At 1:03 AM +0200 2004/05/11, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:

 Many customers, who normally only use the net for web and mail, would
 prefer a mail being sent from Customer Service, and addressed to their
 own address, so that they know the mail was sent to them, and that they
 can hit reply to get help.

 I would certainly prefer that, since a not insignificant fraction of the
 users usually hits "reply to all" anyway.  This creates a lot of
 unneccesary noise on the moderator interface.

I've been thinking about this a bit more. The attributes you're asking for seem to me to be more appropriate to a Customer Relation Manager system, not a mailing list management system.


Any attempt to abuse a mailing list management system (e.g., Mailman) into functioning like a CRM are likely to be both unsuccessful and painful.

I am a strong advocate of using the right tool for the right job, and I'm pretty sure that Mailman is absolutely not the right tool for this one.


If you (or anyone else) had any patches to bring this kind of functionality into Mailman, and they could be guaranteed not to interfere with anything else, I would still be opposed to them, but there would be fewer logical arguments I could make to support my case.


Certainly, I would be strongly opposed to anything that would make it easier to abuse Mailman into a spamming tool, so you'd need to make sure that you addressed that issue as thoroughly as possible in your patches.

If that issue was addressed, then I'd be left with arguments relating to code bloat and size of the community (or potential community) that would benefit from such patches versus the amount of work that would be required to keep them from suffering excessive "bit rot".

However, I think my most persuasive argument would probably be that this would be a slippery slope and the benefited user community would then be even more insistent on seeing additional modifications made in the future to further benefit them to the potential detriment of the rest of the Mailman community, and the expectations that would be set up that could cause these two groups to become adversarial towards each other, with all the resulting fallout, etc....

 Yes, that same functionality could be used to spam, but in most cases it
 won't.  Mailman is simply not efficient enough for that purpose. The
 spammers use hundreds of thousands of worm-infected computers today, to
 spread messages.

Those are the end transmission systems for the bulk of the spam that is sent out, yes. But there is plenty of spam being sent out that does not use bot-nets. Moreover, the spam has to be injected into these bot-nets, and you would have to be very careful to make sure that these modifications don't make it easier to abuse Mailman towards that end.


 I guess many of my problems could be solved by combining mailman
 options, but I'd like a "this is an announcement list" option, that does
 all this for me.

I really don't think what you're asking for is appropriate to a mailing list management system. Try Googling for "customer relationship management system", or words to that effect.



At the ISP I use today, and where I previously worked for two years, they have a simple "POP Bulletin" system to achieve these goals, with the messages appearing to come from Customer Service and all replies being sent back to them. No mailing list management system involved at all -- indeed no MTAs involved, and no extra copies of this message stored anywhere on the server, and no "deliveries" of this message to individual private mailboxes. You can achieve the same sorts of things with a shared IMAP folder system, and subscribing all users to the appropriate shared folder(s).


If you're not an ISP and you can't use "POP Bulletin" or IMAP shared folder solutions, then you'd be left with traditional CRM systems which do actually send out real e-mail messages.

--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.

_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to