At 1:14 AM -0700 2004-06-25, Somuchfun wrote:
Oh, we did test it for a while but this is the kind of problem that you do not encounter lightly in a test environment. And on top it would have helped if the mailman dev team would have published this major change in bounce processing!
They did. Close to the top of the file mailman-2.1.5/NEWS is the following section:
- The bounce processor has been redesigned so that now when an address's
bounce score reaches the threshold, that address will be sent a probe
message. Only if the probe bounces will the address be disabled. The
score is reset to zero when the probe is sent. Also, bounce events are
now kept in an event file instead of in memory. This should help
contain the bloat of the BounceRunner. New supporting variables in Defaults.py: VERP_PROBE_FORMAT,
VERP_PROBE_REGEXPREGISTER_BOUNCES_EVERY is promoted to a Defaults.py variable.
If your MTA doesn't support VERP, then this should have been pretty obvious to you.
-- Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
