--On Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:39 PM -0500 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:19 PM -0400 9/28/06, emf wrote: > >> It seems to me like anyone likely to end up with a huge enough incoming >> mailman queue to care about Maildir's inefficiencies would also be able >> to put a sensible filesystem underneath it. > > That may simply not be possible. Moreover, I have some real > operational problems with both XFS on Linux and ReiserFS, and I would > not run a production mail system using them. Maybe IBM's JFS, if I > were forced to run a production mail system on Linux at all, but > certainly not XFS or ReiserFS. Brad, if your _incoming_ queue is so big that you have to worry, your servers are woefully underspec'd. I understand your dislike for Maildir, but for the _incoming_ queue case, it just shouldn't matter. If you can provide a detailed use case where it matters for the _incoming_ queue, please do so. -- Carson _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
