Barry Warsaw wrote:
I've always found it proper and useful to include the quoted material
of the original message, but trim the quotes to just the bit you are
responding to. I'd call this interleaved-with-trimming.

Top posting has always been a serious breach of netiquette.

I concur and I still consider this to be true on the grounds of legibility. I find it far more clear to read point followed by rebuttal instead of reading rebuttals followed by having to figure out which points were being rebutted.

I think users who prefer top-posting are mostly giving into their MUA's defaults. I don't think most users face MUA inability to edit quoted material. I find the users are also unwilling to put more time into editing, so they don't and now so many don't it is expected that Microsoft Outlook users (for example) will top-post.

Every modern (typically GUI) MUA I know of has a search feature, so I don't buy the notion that it's hard to sift through old emails. I do understand that it's hard to read poorly-reformatted quotes of old emails (a problem I see with top-posting replies) and I wouldn't trust quotes without going back to my copy of that email or a mailing list archive (if I don't have a copy of that post) to verify the quote.

I think modern MUAs in widespread use (with the exception of Thunderbird and its derivatives) don't do proper threading. Therefore many email users don't know what threading is from experience. Maybe some MUA will do threading and become popular and users will think threading is a new feature.

I also think it's right and proper to expect to pick up replies to mailing list posts on the list by default. I don't like having to include a header that tries to convey this desire to MUAs and I don't want another copy of any response sent to me in addition to a copy on the list. Unfortunately I don't know how to get Thunderbird to include the header on every mailing list reply without me having to tell it which addresses are mailing lists. I have a way I'd prefer Thunderbird to handle this but that would be off-topic for this discussion and mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to