I would worry about locking on the databases. Mailman handles this via a lock file in a common directory, so it should work even in active-active, but you would still only have one mailman process able to run on a list at one time. In other words, I don't think you would get much better performance out of the dual system since only one at time would have access to the list databases.
It would be fun to try it out! On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 00:17, David Richards wrote: > How about ACTIVE-ACTIVE sharing the same installation via an NFS mount (or > possibly shared storage in a cluster)? > > D. > ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ This message was sent to: archive@jab.org Unsubscribe or change your options at http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
