Not so much of performance that will be a problem, but more of a availability issue. Yes, would be fun to try...
How about Ian's original idea, about keeping certain directories in sync?? Which directories would that have to be, and can a straight 'cp -R' acheive the syncing?? Dave. >�I would worry about locking on the databases. Mailman handles >�this via a lock file in a common directory, so it should work >�even in active-active, but you would still only have one mailman >�process able to run on a list at one time. In other words, I >�don't think you would get much better performance out of the dual >�system since only one at time would have access to the list >�databases. >�It would be fun to try it out! >� >�On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 00:17, David Richards wrote: >�> How about ACTIVE-ACTIVE sharing the same installation via an >�NFS mount (or > possibly shared storage in a cluster)? >�> >�> D. >�> >� >� Dave Richards Project Manager (Messaging) Information Technology Services Queensland University of Technology ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ This message was sent to: [email protected] Unsubscribe or change your options at http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
