On 04/21/2015 09:42 AM, Adam McGreggor wrote: > > This makes me wonder if it might be useful to have two files in the > Mailman source: > > mailman/cron/crontab.in-system > mailman/cron/crontab.in-user > > with -system including the 'user' column?
Why? Our distribution works when installed per our docs. Downstream packages also tend to do the right thing. Problems tend to occur only when users of packages try to follow our documentation rather that the packager's. > Were the 'offical' source for Mailman be GitHub, there'd be a PR > already, handling that. Just FYI and not addressing the issue of, PRs vs. branches vs. bzr merge proposals, Mailman 3 will probably use GitLabs as it's official repository. We're not there yet, but we recognize that Bazaar lost the war. We can't use GitHub because GitHub uses proprietary software and as a GNU project, we get into issues with FSF if our complete stack is not open source. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
