On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:16:48AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 04/21/2015 09:42 AM, Adam McGreggor wrote: > > This makes me wonder if it might be useful to have two files in the > > Mailman source: > > > > mailman/cron/crontab.in-system > > mailman/cron/crontab.in-user > > > > with -system including the 'user' column? > > Why? Our distribution works when installed per our docs. Downstream > packages also tend to do the right thing. Problems tend to occur only > when users of packages try to follow our documentation rather that the > packager's.
Reading more of the thread, I think that's something that wasn't clear to me; the mixed approach of remnants of a package install, then a source install. > > Were the 'offical' source for Mailman be GitHub, there'd be a PR > > already, handling that. > > Just FYI and not addressing the issue of, PRs vs. branches vs. bzr merge > proposals, Mailman 3 will probably use GitLabs as it's official > repository. We're not there yet, but we recognize that Bazaar lost the war. I think that will help drive community contributions, immensely. It's one barrier removed. > We can't use GitHub because GitHub uses proprietary software and as a > GNU project, we get into issues with FSF if our complete stack is not > open source. *sigh* (and probably better not mentioning further; at least in this (sub-)thread). -- "Get me a beer. I don't care what kind it is, just get me a beer!" -- Duke of Edinburgh, on being offered the finest Italian wines by PM Giuliano Amato at a dinner in Rome in 2000. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org