On 2018-01-24 02:50, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I'd appreciate if those who have strong opinions on this would take a
look at the analysis below and tell me if I'm missing something.

While I don't have a strong opinion, getting two copes of the same message (usual "reply all") behaviour is suboptimal. I've the "please CC me when replying to list" .sig for lists where people do it a lot -- not that I've been on many lately.

The BBS/webforum convention is "private message" that may or may not come with "PM sent" note in the discussion thread. I think that's the reasonable way of doing it and that a MUA, when replying to a ML post, should give the user 2 options: "reply to list" and "reply off-list".

Since the list should rewrite the From header for DKIMARC, these would correspond to list-post/from and reply-to resp.

Dima
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to