No, it doesn't. After all, technically Message-ID is an optional field. I bitch and moan about that, but nobody cares... They all end up pointing to, "SHOULD", and I can't really do anything but :'(
And the information is not pertinent. If this ML is going to become a forum for reporting spam, I'm gone. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -----Original Message----- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Steve Freegard Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 11:33 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Microsoft sending multiple Message-ID headers in password reset links.. On 15/09/15 18:24, Al Iverson via https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=mailop.org&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7c014eb44783c04c70154808d2bdfd28d0%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=iUlvmPaHW9GC7kLBrxjNx0ssuXy8JD5nGgnneQ%2bZV2I%3d wrote: > Is this truly having an immediate negative impact operationally? It > seems like this could be feedback you could give them directly, > offlist, without having to share it with the rest of us. > > Very funny. Feedback to where? Their 1st line support wouldn't have a clue what to do with that. I'm sure that plenty of us check RFC validity (e.g. there shouldn't be more than one Message-Id header), so it's pretty pertinent information. I'm sure it's causing them issues with deliverability because of it. Regards, Steve. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fchilli.nosignal.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fmailop&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7c014eb44783c04c70154808d2bdfd28d0%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=nG6dlE9YS5zm9Ei7ERHdt%2b7AQj9S5YRtdilQ%2fgKgIzs%3d _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
