Rob Nagler <[email protected]> (Mo 19 Mär 2018 21:56:12 CET): .. > It seems Message-ID is a "should" field so our software shouldn't require > it. However, many mailers and spam filters treat Message-IDs as "must". > We'll probably just add one, because some of our users are starting to get > frustrated with mails getting dropped. > > Is adding a Message-ID field a reasonable idea? Alternative suggestions?
We add a the Message-ID on the submission host, if the client is to
stupid to do it. A serious mail service provider should take take that all
messages leaving his system carry a valid message ID, IMHO.
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
