Well, that's the crux of the issue. If I make this change and a DMARC-incompatible mailing list forwards a message to Gmail, the message might be treated as spam. But I don't know which mailing lists are DMARC-incompatible until after I make this change. I'm in a state of paralysis. :-(

Jesse

On 4/6/2018 10:57 AM, Brandon Long wrote:
I know when I suggested it originally on this list, some folks found some bugs, which we fixed.

That said, the spam team seems to reinvent dmarc parsing periodically (on top of our main dmarc processing), and it's often less than correct.  In this case, it'll just mean that mail that doesn't pass will more likely be marked as spam, so it's probably mostly safe if you've gotten most of your sources covered.  And let me know, I can hassle them again if it's broken again.

Brandon

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 8:31 AM Jesse Thompson <jesse.thomp...@wisc.edu <mailto:jesse.thomp...@wisc.edu>> wrote:

    Great, thank you!  I'll give it a whirl and report back if anything
    negative happens.

    Jesse

    On 4/5/2018 7:42 PM, Todd Herr via mailop wrote:
     > We saw no negative side effects when we did it here for our
    domains, and
     > we did it for precisely the reason you're planning to do it, to
    trigger
     > Google Groups.
     >
     > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Jesse Thompson
    <jesse.thomp...@wisc.edu <mailto:jesse.thomp...@wisc.edu>
     > <mailto:jesse.thomp...@wisc.edu
    <mailto:jesse.thomp...@wisc.edu>>> wrote:
     >
     >     Does anyone know of any negative side effects of setting a DMARC
     >     policy: p=quarantine pct=0 ?
     >
     >     Is it equivalent to: p=none ?
     >
     >     I'm curious because I want to trigger Google Groups (and maybe
     >     others list forwarders?) to rewrite the From in a DMARC compliant
     >     fashion *prior* to changing the domain's DMARC policy... to avoid
     >     the "leap of faith" that p=none's monitoring mode was supposed to
     >     alleviate.
     >
     >     Thanks,
     >     Jesse
     >     _______________________________________________
     >     mailop mailing list
     > mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
    <mailto:mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>>
     > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
     >     <https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop>
     >
     >
     >
     >
     > --
     >
     > *todd herr**
     > **sr. delivery engineer
     > www.sparkpost.com <http://www.sparkpost.com>
    <http://www.sparkpost.com>*
     > *twitter* @toddherr @sparkpost
     >
     > *tel* 415-578-5222 x477
     > *mobile* 703-220-4153
     > *email* todd.h...@sparkpost.com <mailto:todd.h...@sparkpost.com>
     > <mailto:firstname.lastn...@messagesystems.com
    <mailto:firstname.lastn...@messagesystems.com>>
     >
     >
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > mailop mailing list
     > mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
     > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
     >

    _______________________________________________
    mailop mailing list
    mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
    https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to