Sorry, should have clarified; a mixture of spam and SSH bruteforcing attempts.
On Fri, 10 May 2019, 21:43 Luis E. Muñoz via mailop, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 May 2019, at 11:49, James Cloos via mailop wrote: > > >>>>>> "CW" == Chris Woods via mailop <[email protected]> writes: > > > > CW> Like others I've reached the end of my tether with DO. In my case, > I've > > CW> seen increasing volumes of malicious / junk traffic via their IPv6 > > CW> prefixes, with reports to abuse doing virtually nothing, so now I > just > > CW> define ip/ip6tables drop rules. > > > > That is odd. They have always blocked 25 out on v6. > > > > Port 25 outgoing only works from any of theirs on v4. > > This is still the case with my DO droplets. > > Best regards > > -lem > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > [email protected] > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
