-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 14:01 +0000, Gregory Heytings wrote:
> > > > > From their web site: WHITELISTING IS RECOMMENDED FOR IP 
> > > > > 217.182.79.147. Registration is available for 1 Month (25 CHF), 6 
> > > > > Month (50 CHF), 12 Month (70 CHF), 24 Month (90 CHF) . So yes, 
> > > > > perhaps it's not extortion.  We may call it demanding money with 
> > > > > menaces, exaction, extraction, blackmail...
> > > > 
> > > > Lot's of things in life require payment(s), or purchase of addon 
> > > > equipment, depending on your circumstances in life, your living 
> > > > arrangements, or your location.  If you are in a high-crime area your 
> > > > mortgage insurance will probably require you to purchase an alarm, or 
> > > > if your home is prone to house fires, a smoke detector.  Then there 
> > > > are taxes, fees, licenses, etc.  Life is self is pay-to-play, whether 
> > > > you realize it or not.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, and when they'll need more beer they can just update their 
> > > formula so as to blacklist a whole AS on the first spam, or maybe the 
> > > whole RIR.
> > 
> > That's a fair point, there's no reason to not question their motives. I 
> > just personally don't see that it's a profit center for them.
> > 
> 
> Just do the math.  They blocked at least 100K IPs, because 1% of these IPs 
> sent spam in the last 7 days.  If 0.5% of those 100K IPs decide to 
> subscribe to their whitelist, that's at least 50000 CHF / 24 months. 
> Which is I guess a rather comfortable income that largely exceeds their 
> costs.

How do you know that's not the same situation as the PBL?  Who says that
it was uceprotect's decision alone to list 100K IPs?


> Also, they seem to ignore that, while it is feasible for ISPs to eradicate 
> spam on their network, it is impossible for server providers to do this:

That sounds a lot like apathy.  Even the banks are required to KYC.

> 
> "If big providers like DTAG and Microsoft can so effectively prevent that 
> their customers are sending spam, why can your provider not also do so? 
> The simple answer is: The Abuse Departements of providers NOT listed in 
> our Level 3 are doing an excellent job, while those listed do not. If your 
> provider really wants to stop the excessive spam coming from their ranges 
> they would simply install some preventive measures."
> 
> Honest customers can have their WordPress website hacked.

Most don't, case studies have shown that it's apathy that causes most
wordpress hacks.

- -Jim P.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE3RmV4WutJ2KyCS2zPcxbabkKGJ8FAmAJirUACgkQPcxbabkK
GJ/jMQ//Rz6ksQNBXDOja83J6D0bGY9YEejL5tvPjOKMEbb8N5kQnmz6acDMZmAl
9lHkKUMAGy0nGwggXxFaE8pyFg6ClGeOSz+6yQsxOvzz2KszprsV/xEENQRAUrrh
VuqpTThAGC2Ltg4gbe9VUF0PNfpvw7KiuUpaeHssO2fch8ePJ6GRmwR3LUBH16Bh
wYmxhWS2OGP87WcqcYQJzPgK67pvbi7u/LXgf+3Brw3trgXnI7HUVKr3ulMlpKot
RkzfaoCmsPGKNi0Upa7PwgRMSZ+/JpO6E5g5FoYtVq6UCZmEXth3dT9pLFUvzhus
voUNPUkRsaQtyRi1j5B3GpL+PwHPKVQW2cITnjG45a8T8ShxZMIAMEvKHEDqxk4m
q6nApxtLvSA211o/LrpGYYYTcFv1Q836E8Rkt2LEZ8Di6WvRIdQkhceR/glMWdEX
3WgpMXPyJQj93/boiTF+S9trie4CI4n++mWBL1WYMONd9qWkJhHzpPqEBYMrc8aA
+UP0Xvfggty/IxPw+wdQVvT+aDi4V0Tw5Qwnt0mFVoMMX1Nc2Ny3cv+muICoAeWL
RuyJwVac/c4J6SrD5BCKLbbuUi2AsDCSR71XAomLfNKTbICe1Z3UMRHjPlGc9Cuj
FoHnxIVUckRf0s0M+nH95UzB8RbD/fg7eMkRGcsej7o6TzC07+E=
=73Hx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to