On 10/15/21 17:40, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
On 10/15/21 5:37 PM, Dave Crocker via mailop wrote:
Yes, but... That's the point that is intuitively reasonable which
doesn't make real sense to me, after thinking about it.
What doesn't make real sense to you? The relation of reputation and
spreading services across multiple IPs?
I'm not seeing how 'reputation' interacts for these two functions.
The motivation for spreading service IPs across different /24 prefixes
is so that if (when) enough individual /32 IPs get enough negative
reputation to pull down the /24 aggregate prefix, only the services in
said /24 aggregate prefix would be harmed.
Put more simply, it makes snowshoe spamming harder to detect.
--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
