Dnia 12.01.2024 o godz. 11:18:32 Tim Starr via mailop pisze: > By publishing the BIMI spec. No one's required to follow the spec, but if > they don't, then they're not doing BIMI, and that's not the fault of the > spec.
Does the BIMI spec *require* that *only* BIMI-authenticated messages can have logos displayed alongside them in the MUA? In my understanding no. If it actually states so, then it's far too restrictive and unacceptable (and this *is* fault of the spec). That's what im talking about all the time. So MUAs that display "other" (non-BIMI !) logos, are doing BIMI *plus* something else. They are not contrary to the BIMI spec. They are just in addition doing something that is completely orthogonal to BIMI, but gives similar visual experience to the user. Which actually defeats the purpose of BIMI, as I understand it. -- Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa [email protected] -- "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
