[sNip]
> Of course, I feel compelled to point out that I'm doing the same
> > thing right now as the BIMI Group is doing (no PEM defined in the
> > "a=" parameter), and I think this is fine and that it's perfectly
> > okay for the BIMI Group to do it this way too.
>
> A self-asserted logo as you have and as the domain bimigroup.org has is
> certainly valid from a specification perspective; however, not all mailbox
> providers that participate in BIMI support the display of logos that are
> self-asserted.
That's my understanding, too. (I like the term "self-assessed" that
you're using as I feel it perfectly describes what's going on here.)
I favour the approach of indicating to the end-user somehow whether
a logo is certified with valid PEM data because, overall, this
generally leads to a better end-user experience. I actually think
this approach should be encouraged in the specfiication.
--
Postmaster - [email protected]
Randolf Richardson, CNA - [email protected]
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
