On 2026-03-31 at 07:11:33 UTC-0400 (Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:11:33 +0200)
Patrick Ben Koetter via mailop <[email protected]>
is rumored to have said:

# NOTE and Off-Topic: a:eu.kictanet.or.ke and mx:eu.kictanet.or.ke repeat your # final ip4:62.169.28.150 statement. Unless you really need them for other # purposes I'd get rid of a:eu.kictanet.or.ke and mx:eu.kictanet.or.ke and # leave only ip4:62.169.28.150. Having the DNS names in there causes extra DNS
# lookups.

On the other hand, things do change and people do forget updating a TXT record...

Specifying a, mx, and ip directives which happen to be redundant *today* does impose (tiny) DNS cost on systems using SPF. As in so many things with DNS, this is mitigated by having reasonably long DNS TTLs. If a mail system changes it's IP or adds IPv6 outbound (imagine an optimistic masochist...) and the SPF record has only a single ip4 directive, SPF breaks. The a and mx directives can salvage that situation.




--
Bill Cole
[email protected] or [email protected]
(AKA @[email protected] and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Please keep discussion mailing list replies *on-list*
Not Currently Available For Hire
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to