On 01/04/09, 11:20:55, James Lee <[email protected]> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-maintainers] Runtime linker pathes in GAR:

> On 01/04/09, 11:05:35, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote regarding
> Re: [csw-maintainers] Runtime linker pathes in GAR:

> > > The nice thing about using LD_OPTIONS is it doesn't need escaping
> > > (more than initially) and can put $ISALIST first without libtool
> > > interfering.

> > Maybe this is the one occasion where using LD_OPTIONS does
> > more good than bad? Just for '-R'?

> I suspect that on these occasions LD_OPTIONS wasn't used.

PS... Sorry I am muddling occasions, I'm thinking the subject occasion
is "we have a lot of bad RPATHs" but we've moved to the topic to "how
to easily set an $ in the first element of an RPATH", and yes LD_OPTIONS
does it.



James.
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Reply via email to