Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > James is currently in the tedious task of reviewing all > runtime linker pathes from the packages.
Just for clarification: is it only about correcting those incorrectly quoted RUNPATHs or are we supposed to also adjust the RUNPATH (via LINKER_FLAGS or similar) depending on what our applications use (i.e. drop .../$ISALIST or even /opt/csw/lib completely)? I personally would prefer to just have GAR corrected WRT to the $ISALIST quoting issue and not add more intelligence to the build description, except maybe for applications where the startup delay might have a performance impact. Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
