Hi William, > After having some talk with Sebastian, i have the folowwing proposition. > Since we are renaming some of the X11 packages to add a prefix, and > about to do some mass change. What about adding a more explicit prefix ? > > For instance fooproto could be renamed to : > > a/ xfooxproto > b/ x11-fooproto > c/ x11proto-foo > d/ x11proto-foo-devel > > Current proposition is a. My choice goes to d. I would like to also add > the -devel suffix since it is a true devel package
Are these catalog- or package-names? catalogname usually contain _ instead of -, and the current standard uses CSWfoodevel instead of CSWfoo-devel. That would mean a/ xfooxproto CSWxfooxproto b/ x11_fooproto CSWx11fooproto c/ x11proto_foo CSWx11protofoo d/ x11proto_foo_devel CSWx11protofoodevel Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
