On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:43 AM, William Bonnet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > > After having some talk with Sebastian, i have the folowwing proposition. > Since we are renaming some of the X11 packages to add a prefix, and about to > do some mass change. What about adding a more explicit prefix ? > > For instance fooproto could be renamed to : > > a/ xfooxproto > b/ x11-fooproto > c/ x11proto-foo > d/ x11proto-foo-devel > > Current proposition is a. My choice goes to d. I would like to also add the > -devel suffix since it is a true devel package
d isnt a bad choice... the one issue being that it would look a little silly for stuff that already has "x" in it. x11proto_xext_devel vs x11proto_input_devel people will probably gripe about "well how come Xexp, but no Xinput...?" _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
