On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <[email protected]> wrote: > Do people think it makes sense to include it? It looks like a shared > directory. 5 packages use it already, and another 6 use > /opt/csw/var/run, which is going to be ported. This makes 11 packages. > Is it enough? >
errr.. there's also the issue of, should we actually be USING "/opt/csw/var/run"? it is rather different from the standard system version of /var/run, in that the system one is tmpfs, and nuked after every reboot. also.. why would we not use /var/run directly? we would just need to be careful about the naming of what goes in there. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
