On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: .... >> that may be one way to do it. However, It "feels" to me, to be better >> to be more consistent about the user-touching implementation. >> By that I mean, it might be nice if possible to consistently have the >> symlink be 'directly' to the target, whether NFS shared or otherwise. >... > >> That has the additional benefit that you do not have to do any >> "special configuration" if you want to do mixed modes. >> ... >> >> rsync -a /opt/csw/. nfs-master:/opt/csw >> (or to any other machine, maybe just a "client" instead of nfs server!) >> >> and have it "work right" after copying. > > This sucks as it is in direct opposition to sparse zones.
Could you remind us as to how, please? > We get > in so much trouble with this that I am constantly asking myself > if it is worth it. By "this", do you mean "alternatives"? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
