An additional after-thought:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> that may be one way to do it. However, It "feels" to me, to be better >> to be more consistent about the user-touching implementation. >> By that I mean, it might be nice if possible to consistently have the >> symlink be 'directly' to the target, whether NFS shared or otherwise. > > Alternatives just doesn't work this way and I don't have time to > modify the behaviour correctly in the code. > Ya know... this is supposed to be an "Open" organization.... How about you refer our customer to the code, reference my email suggestions here, and say to him, "sorry I dont have much time, but if you would like to fix the code so that it works this other way instead, that would be acceptible". _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
