On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's convoluted due to the fact that the upstream package is chkconfig > which includes other tools for RHEL-based distros in addition to the > alternatives bit. >
i'm not surprised. which is why I reiterate my suggestion that we should merely duplicate the user-level interface (and only the bits we actually care about), and thus avoid extra baggage. >> Although really, it seems like such a relatively small set of >> functionality that we actually care about, that we'd probably be >> better just tossing it and doing our own implementation in a >> system-normal-shell script. already, a good chunk of what we care >> about in it, is in "our own code", by virtue of the class action >> script wrappers. > > While that may be, somebody still has to actually care enough to do > it. > yah. and while I CARE about it, I dont have enough TIME to do it :( _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
