On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Aug 23 18:43:47 -0400 2010: > >> Incidentally, I tested and committed the changes into gar trunk for >> cswclassutils, and was going to put a test package out for folks... >> but now it's whining about stuff and I have no idea how to fix it. > > gmake makesums; > <update version number in Makefile> > svn ci -m 'cswclassutils blah blah' > > It was the makesums bit that stopped things from working[1].
well, it initially whined about that. then I did the make makesums. then it built the package.. but it was UNCOMMITTED... then I tried the build again... then it blew up, with some very unhelpful messages. > It may > have worked prior to your commit if you hadn't done a `gmake > clean|spotless` in the meantime i did not do that. > We had previously decided to split this package into per-classutil > packages with classutils itself depending on all the sub-packages...I > guess now is the time to do that? possibly. there may be a little bit of clumping granularity that makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure. Maybe *conf* stuff.. and then *etc* stuff, and then misc? I didnt realize we had quite so many scripts (12!) when I first suggested the split. Do we really want a separate package per script? (maybe we do, I dunno) > [1] I was going to rip the makesums stuff out, but it proved to be a > much more invasive change to GAR than I'd expected and testing it > stalled. Nuts. I was wondering why it was still there even after I did an update of gar tree. How about just changing the "verify checksums" bit to always return true, for now? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
