No dia 1 de Setembro de 2010 09:45, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> escreveu: > Hi, > > Am 24.08.2010 um 17:34 schrieb Philip Brown: >> >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue Aug 24 09:09:18 -0400 2010: >>> >>>> thats fine an all, for "external" files... but at the same time, it >>>> doesn't make much sense to be running checksums on files which are >>>> kept in our subversion repository >>> >>> This would be an easy fix, as we'd simply drop $(PATCHFILES) from the >>> $(CHECKSUMFILES) variable, leaving only the tarballs/source files... >> >> Would that catch (or rather , skip!) things such as the cswclassutils >> files.. which are not strictly "patches", yet are not downloaded >> either? > > I have now made a very simple change to GAR, which excludes things in files/ > from checksumming. These files are usually in the repository and don't need > checksumming. All files pulled in from anywhere else are still checksummed. > See the change at > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/10862
Yes, if anything in files/ would not match the repository, GAR would add the UNCOMMITTED tag. An operation equivalent to checksumming is still done in files/. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
