No dia 4 de Dezembro de 2010 07:10, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> escreveu: > > Ha Maciej, > > Am 04.12.2010 um 07:28 schrieb "Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" > <[email protected]>: >> The "direct" part is not obvious, but we have that explicitly stated >> in the shared libraries documentation (somewhere under the standards/ >> pages), but not in general. > > The link 64 should be in corert really as the using apps rely on it.
I do agree with that. There are 2 separate issues: - which package does the symlink belong to? - given that the symlink is in gcc4core, what should be the dependencies of a newly built package? You referred to the first one; I did to the second one. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
