Hi Maciej, Am 06.12.2010 um 11:36 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > No dia 6 de Dezembro de 2010 10:21, Dagobert Michelsen > <[email protected]> escreveu: >> Hi Maciej, >> >> It should be made a GAR built-in. Maybe like this? >> DISTFILES += CSWmypkg.releasemgr >> EXTRA_PROTOTYPE_INFOFILES_CSWmypkg = releasemgr > > To refer to the same file as CSWmysql.foo and foo is slightly > unintuitive. I'd say: > > EXTRA_INFOFILES_CSWmypkg = foo > > This would imply DISTFILES += CSWmypkg.foo (no need to specify separately)
Implying something in DISTFILES is always a bad idea as it means that the contents is always present as a file. IMHO it should be left to the maintainer to either distribute it in files/ or generate it dynamically in the Makefile. > Alternatively: > > DISTFILES += CSWmypkg.foo > > This would imply EXTRA_INFOFILES_CSWmypkg = foo. > > I like the latter more, because you refer to the exact file name you > put into the files/ subdirectory. So for me also a favor for the second solution. One last question: When I read INFOFILES I think of texinfo-files, or at most pkginfo, but not prototype "i"-files. Maybe we can get some more informal votes on the best name? Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
