Hi Geoff, Am 06.12.2010 um 08:07 schrieb Geoff Davis: > On 12/3/2010 11:49 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: >> I do agree with that. There are 2 separate issues: >> - which package does the symlink belong to? >> - given that the symlink is in gcc4core, what should be the >> dependencies of a newly built package? > > In light of these issues, what should I do with my package in the meantime? > Should I wait for someone to step up and do a quick respool of gcc4corert > with the "64" symlink included
Peter Felecan is AFAIK working on an gcc4 update (;-) but if you want to get your package released now I suggest filing a bug against gcc4corert, depending your package on gcc4core and make a comment about the reason for the dependency and that it should be adjusted after the bug has been fixed. > , or make my package depend on gcc4core? I am hoping to finish work on > packaging the Generic Mapping Tools but I can't do that until I get NetCDF > and friends out the door. Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
