Hi Maciej, Am 04.12.2010 um 08:49 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > No dia 4 de Dezembro de 2010 07:10, Dagobert Michelsen > <[email protected]> escreveu: >> Am 04.12.2010 um 07:28 schrieb "Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" >> <[email protected]>: >>> The "direct" part is not obvious, but we have that explicitly stated >>> in the shared libraries documentation (somewhere under the standards/ >>> pages), but not in general. >> >> The link 64 should be in corert really as the using apps rely on it. > > I do agree with that. There are 2 separate issues: > > - which package does the symlink belong to? > - given that the symlink is in gcc4core, what should be the > dependencies of a newly built package? > > You referred to the first one; I did to the second one.
Hehe, with the background of a perfectionist it would of course be nice if checkpkg could detect this :-) That means the dependency of the package is essentially correct, but does not work with the currently "broken" gcc4corert package. Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
